@Arn213
Ahhh, the golden rule. Yes, feel free to play with it and I look forward to it
Thank your posting the pre-production stage as I was intrigued how you did the print shots. I had a feeling you either used a “digital wall paper” as a back ground or you had an actual canvas back drop that was painted (rolled down or a sliding panel). I wasn’t sure how you had the objects placed in position. I thought possibly with heavy duty nylon strings and they were suspended. Then it came to me after seeing the finish product that man, would it be cool if this was shot layered just like you have with pieces you posted (that I love) because you did a 3 way layering of the foreground (object), middle ground (natural wood) and the back ground. I kind of was thinking almost like a shadow box effect where you had those 3 layers, except you actually floated an actual frame with a profile and a finish, then shoot them like you do. You would have to suspend that frame though on a track, in the ceiling that can be movable with transparent cables (or metal cables and you edit them with a software). Then just like Li’l Mikey’s mind, I thought why not framed these beautiful things!
So I did a little exercise for you and open up an opportunity because what you already have in place. I don’t know if you would have any use for it- an added element to the real thing for your client and maybe you sell frame prints of the different avifauna that you have catalogued and photographed over the years. I did want to touch upon the
aspect ratio as I wanted to show folks who does art, photography and print work how the proportional relationship of the width and height is important when you have the background and the object- but, the biggest element is that if you keep the standard aspect ratio, it will save you money when framing these if you stay with standard size (4 x 6, 5 x 7, 8 x 10, 11 x 14, etc.), it will save you money as oppose to going custom if your aspect ratio is off standard. The idea is that all the craftsman here, you can then buy a standard size archival matting and uv glass, then you can frame your work using whatever wood you want and do whatever custom profile (requiring profile cutters if they are complex).
The aspect ratio that worked with this specific size composition is a 14 x 20 and a 9 x 12 that did not affect the integrity of your photo Barry. Of course you can double that number and it will work. The idea is that you have to know the correct aspect ratio for standard sizes for framing so you don’t cut/trim a lot of the background and minimize it so it doesn’t affect the integrity of your composition.
The first one is the 14 x 20 and I wanted to show you the footprint of that aspect ratio and what gets trimmed out- of course you can move that size around the print and trim to whatever balances out the composition.
The second one is 9 x 12 with different matting and framing to give you an idea what size matting can change and effect the composition:
It is a tough choice to select which aspect ratio work’s best. But, one of them to me balance’s out better than the other. Thank you Barry for letting me have a little fun with your fabulous work as it keeps me from not buying and hoarding more wood when I am on this site…..
Arn