• New Woodbarter Hats Are Available!!! Scroll down on the main page to the Member Activities & Site Support, Then click on Wood Barter SCHWAG and go to the topics on hats by Woodtickgreg to order your hat. There's only a limited quanity, so don't wait to get yours.

Almug wood

Sprung

Amateur Sawdust Maker
Full Member
Messages
9,722
Reaction score
16,211
Location
WI
First name
Matt
Had a chance to do a little looking this evening. My study didn't really turn up anything new.

My Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon (BDB) doesn't suggest anything for almug.

One of my study Bibles has a note that reads, "Its identity is unknown, though some suggest it is juniper."

One interesting thing to note though is a connection with 2 Chronicles 2:8 and 2 Chronicles 9:10-11, with the building of the temple being chronicled there as well. These verses mention algum wood. That swapping of those two letters also occurs in the Hebrew text. Keep in mind that these ancient scrolls would have been hand copied and occasionally copying errors would get missed. Some of the copying would even be done with one person reading from a scroll and a room full of people writing down what was read to them. This could lead one down the path of studying variants in texts, etc.

For algum, my BDB only mentions sandalwood - "perh. sandal-wood". Which is what Strong's Concordance also suggests.

In 2 Chronicles 9:11 echoes 1 Kings 10:12 and it's said that the algum wood was made into steps (could also mean supports), but also into lyres and harps. As steps or supports - both sandalwood and juniper are rot resistant (though perhaps not so much of a concern in the dry climate of Jerusalem as it would be somewhere with a wet climate), though juniper would've yielded larger pieces of timber - important, depending on where and how it was used in construction. As tone woods - juniper can be a tone wood and a search for sandalwood instruments suggests that it can also be used in musical instruments.

Considering that almug and algum are both used to refer to the exact same thing in different accounts, it's certain that these two words refer to the same wood.

To be honest, I'm not sure we can say for certain which wood is being referenced - juniper or sandalwood - or if it could even be another wood. Both of these woods would have been fitting for use in the building of the Lord's house and for instruments in use there. No expense was spared in searching out the best for the building of the temple and, since suitable wood for the endeavor did not exist in the area of Jerusalem or in Israel, such wood had to be imported.

So, in the end, a long post to say that, after doing some study, I don't know and have no suggestions, beyond what has already been given, as to which wood is being spoken of. :sarcastic: A case could be made for it being either wood.

This post brought to you by the following printed resources, as well as a few digital resources:

B.jpg

Now back to work! I needed to grab these off the shelf tonight anyways - tonight I'm working on preparing a sermon on Psalm 73:23-26 for a funeral on Thursday.
 

B Rogers

Member
Full Member
Messages
853
Reaction score
1,244
Location
North Alabama
First name
Bryson
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #22
Had a chance to do a little looking this evening. My study didn't really turn up anything new.

My Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon (BDB) doesn't suggest anything for almug.

One of my study Bibles has a note that reads, "Its identity is unknown, though some suggest it is juniper."

One interesting thing to note though is a connection with 2 Chronicles 2:8 and 2 Chronicles 9:10-11, with the building of the temple being chronicled there as well. These verses mention algum wood. That swapping of those two letters also occurs in the Hebrew text. Keep in mind that these ancient scrolls would have been hand copied and occasionally copying errors would get missed. Some of the copying would even be done with one person reading from a scroll and a room full of people writing down what was read to them. This could lead one down the path of studying variants in texts, etc.

For algum, my BDB only mentions sandalwood - "perh. sandal-wood". Which is what Strong's Concordance also suggests.

In 2 Chronicles 9:11 echoes 1 Kings 10:12 and it's said that the algum wood was made into steps (could also mean supports), but also into lyres and harps. As steps or supports - both sandalwood and juniper are rot resistant (though perhaps not so much of a concern in the dry climate of Jerusalem as it would be somewhere with a wet climate), though juniper would've yielded larger pieces of timber - important, depending on where and how it was used in construction. As tone woods - juniper can be a tone wood and a search for sandalwood instruments suggests that it can also be used in musical instruments.

Considering that almug and algum are both used to refer to the exact same thing in different accounts, it's certain that these two words refer to the same wood.

To be honest, I'm not sure we can say for certain which wood is being referenced - juniper or sandalwood - or if it could even be another wood. Both of these woods would have been fitting for use in the building of the Lord's house and for instruments in use there. No expense was spared in searching out the best for the building of the temple and, since suitable wood for the endeavor did not exist in the area of Jerusalem or in Israel, such wood had to be imported.

So, in the end, a long post to say that, after doing some study, I don't know and have no suggestions, beyond what has already been given, as to which wood is being spoken of. :sarcastic: A case could be made for it being either wood.

This post brought to you by the following printed resources, as well as a few digital resources:

View attachment 219414

Now back to work! I needed to grab these off the shelf tonight anyways - tonight I'm working on preparing a sermon on Psalm 73:23-26 for a funeral on Thursday.
Thank you for your input and study on this. I appreciate it.
 

Mike Hill

Board Whoarder
Full Member
Messages
11,106
Reaction score
27,590
Location
Nashville, TN
First name
Mike
My 1619 KJV has the passage this way. "And the nauie also of Hiram that brought gold from Ophir, brought in from Ophir, great plentie of Almug trees, and precious stones. And the king made of the Almug trees, pillars for the house of the Lord, and for the Kings house, Harpes also and Psalteries for singers: there came no such Almug trees, nor were seene vnto this day"

John Wycliff - the first to translate the Bible into English, I think he used the Vulgate rather than original greek and hebrew, and translated it this way in 1382-1384 (handwritten bible) - "But also the schip of Hiram, that brouyte gold fro Ophis, brouyte fro Ophir ful many trees of tyme and preciouse stoonys. And kyng Salomon made of the trees of tyme vndir settyngis of the hows of the Lord, and of the kyngis hows, and harpis, and sitols to syngeris; siche trees of tyme weren not brouty nether seyn, til in to present dai." To say he and his translation was not liked by the religious authorities of the time is not an understatement. He died of a stroke while saying mass in 1384. 44 years later he was declared a heretic and tthe Pope of the time, had his body exhumed, burned and the ashes cast into a river.

William Tyndale was the first to print the NT into English in 1534. He was in process of translating the OT, but was executed (strangled and burned at the stake) for the heresy of translating the Bible into something more people could read. Myles Coverdale and John Roger continued the OT work of Tyndale and published a Bible. This is how the Cloverdale Bible (1535) has the passage - "And Hirams shippes, which caried golde out of Ophir, broughte maruelous moch costly tymper and precious stones from Ophis. And of that costly tymber the kynge caused to make pilers in the house of the LORDE, and in ye kinges house, and harpes and Psalteries fro the Musicians. There came nomore soch costly tymber, nether was it sene vnto this daye."
 
Top