• New Woodbarter Hats Are Available!!! Scroll down on the main page to the Member Activities & Site Support, Then click on Wood Barter SCHWAG and go to the topics on hats by Woodtickgreg to order your hat. There's only a limited quanity, so don't wait to get yours.

Question Of The Week.... ( 2026 Week 21 )

SENC

...
Full Member
Messages
9,783
Reaction score
24,545
Location
NC
First name
Henry
Well they did have better steel if you compare older tools to newer Chinese slop but modern powder metallurgy is classes above older carbon or simple alloy steels.
You are absolutely correct about the steel itself, though I'm less certain the right steel is matched with the right tools (given less and less focus on hand toools these days). Hand tools are either mass-produced with a focus on maximizing margin with cheaper components - or they're made by boutique companies for folks with deep pockets (Bridge City Tools comes to mind).

In the plane world, for example there are certainly a few high-end tool makers (LN, Veritas, etc.) still making good products and using exceptional quality materials. I have an LN block plane that I really like, but I much prefer my old Craftsman (and clone) planes simply because the steel (while technically inferior) is perfectly designed for the work. Hard enough to hold an edge well (though not as well as the new stuff), but thinner and lighter and so much easier to sharpen. I'd rather spend more time working and less time sharpening, and the good, old stuff hits the right balance where I'd have to spend a lot more time (on the whole) with newer, harder metals.

Saws are another example - I don't have any interest in another hard steel hand-saw. The idea of longer-lasting sharpness/teeth is attractive on the surface, but makes the tools impossible to sharpen myself with a file. And don't get me started on the worthlessness of most modern files.

Agree with Lee when it comes to turning tools - but then I have a decent investment in a nice grinder with CBN wheels so I can sharpen the better steels. If I was limited to stone wheels and an underpowered grinder, I suspect I'd be happier with some of the less expensive grades of steel.
 

daniscool

Member
Full Member
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
2,114
Location
austria
First name
Daniel
You are absolutely correct about the steel itself, though I'm less certain the right steel is matched with the right tools (given less and less focus on hand toools these days). Hand tools are either mass-produced with a focus on maximizing margin with cheaper components - or they're made by boutique companies for folks with deep pockets (Bridge City Tools comes to mind).

In the plane world, for example there are certainly a few high-end tool makers (LN, Veritas, etc.) still making good products and using exceptional quality materials. I have an LN block plane that I really like, but I much prefer my old Craftsman (and clone) planes simply because the steel (while technically inferior) is perfectly designed for the work. Hard enough to hold an edge well (though not as well as the new stuff), but thinner and lighter and so much easier to sharpen. I'd rather spend more time working and less time sharpening, and the good, old stuff hits the right balance where I'd have to spend a lot more time (on the whole) with newer, harder metals.

Saws are another example - I don't have any interest in another hard steel hand-saw. The idea of longer-lasting sharpness/teeth is attractive on the surface, but makes the tools impossible to sharpen myself with a file. And don't get me started on the worthlessness of most modern files.

Agree with Lee when it comes to turning tools - but then I have a decent investment in a nice grinder with CBN wheels so I can sharpen the better steels. If I was limited to stone wheels and an underpowered grinder, I suspect I'd be happier with some of the less expensive grades of steel.
Well, I will take plane irons as an example.

While modern steels are harder to sharpen, there are laminated blade which make the process very simple. (Thinking dictums japanese paper steel blades)

While older steel is easier to sharpen than modern steel that is mainly due to the difference in carbides and steel toughness (a very complex area that, if someone wants to cover should be covered by reading a book)
This also reduces its edge retention.

For example, CPM magnacut is quite okay to sharpen (yes it’s still harder than an old cast steel knife but it is also 63 hrc while the cast steel knife is about 56) and it has about five to six times the edge retention of the cast steel. Pair that with proper blade maintenance (stropping) and you have to sharpen once every two hours of constant use. The cast steel needs resharpening after about 20 minutes.

The cast steel takes about one minute to sharpen, the magnacut just under 2. Being able to work without being interrupted with sharpening for six times as long is a blessing I am not willing to give up.
 

DLJeffs

Member
Full Member
Messages
6,766
Reaction score
17,172
Location
central Oregon
First name
Doug
Henry ( @SENC ) makes a good point about files. It sure seems like the files I have don't last very long. I can get more action from 80 grit sand paper than I can from most of my files. Now those Japanese rasps are another story.
 
Top